In 2020 Jewish Power & Democrats bid up the Value of the Black Vote to Ludicrous Levels because They Feared Trump might shave off Enough Black Votes to Win Re-Election — The Problem for Jews and Democrats wasn't that Trump was Anti-Black but Too Pro-Black — To Compete with Trump's Appeals to Blacks, the Jewish-run Democratic Party pulled all the stops and elevated Blacks to god-status to keep them on their side

CHAUVIN'S WHITE GUILT - Brother Nathanael

BLM got totally crazy in 2020 because of the bidding war for holy blackness.

Usually, Jews and Libby-Dibs needed not worry about the black vote because it was reliably Democratic. And the kind of bland generic white candidates put up by the GOP had no appeal to blacks. Even though the great majority of blacks voted Democratic in 2016 and 2020, Trump was the GOP candidate in a long long time with any appeal to a segment of the black population. If Billy Boy Clinton was the 'first black president', Donald Trump was the 'first ni**a president'. Clinton was a jazz man, but Trump rubbed shoulders with rappers and had a rapport with the likes of Mike Tyson. For Democrats to win in some states, black support has to be HUGE. So, even a slight shaving off of black votes can mean electoral loss for Democrats. If GOP relies on whites voting 60% Republican, Democrats rely on blacks voting way over 90% Democratic. Democrats took the black vote for granted, just like they did with white working class and ethnics in the past, especially following the Great Depression and New Deal.

But eventually, the Democrats began to lose the white working class, the ethnics, and the Southern whites. A lot of this had to do with blacks. When the Democrats were about 'class justice', many have-lesser whites voted for the Democratic Party. Working class, ethnic whites, and southern whites were reliably Democratic for a long time. But when the Democrats moved more toward 'racial justice' rhetoric, followed by black pathology and crime unloosed on the nation, many whites began to move to the GOP. Also, with booming times, many children of working class parents rose up the ranks to become middle class and higher, and back then, money and success were associated with WASP-heavy GOP. It's like Italian-Americans became more Republican with socio-economic improvement.
Back then, the GOP stood for tradition and respectability, concerns that still mattered. Today, no one cares for tradition. Also, respectability means nothing in a degraded culture where even adults have green hair and tattoos.
What matters now is the cachet of being faddish and fashionable; that's what appeals to the successful, and today's affluent and educated are far more likely to be Democratic, especially as the Party is now shamelessly pro-money and pro-success. Democrats lost the white working class but gained something far more valuable: the white educated and elite classes who hold the more valuable cards. Also, globalism is geared to favor the urban rich and has little room for white working class unless one is a truck driver(that is until self-driving cars become a thing). So, Democrats won over the useful kinds of whites whereas the GOP hasn't a clue what to do with the 'loser' white working class that voted for Donald Trump as the Party's been for so long a wing of the Chamber of Commerce. As for Trump, he got their votes and they showed up at his rallies in droves, but his presidency has been about 'Muh Israel' and 'Muh Negroes'.

In the foreseeable future, the Democrats may no longer need the black votes so much. In California, for example, the black vote is meaningless. But in places like Atlanta, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and etc., black votes can tip the scale. So, for the time being, the Democrats need all the black votes they can get. Before Trump, this wasn't much of a concern as it's difficult to imagine blacks voting for the likes of Mitt Romney or Jeb Bush. But Trump struck a nerve with a segment of the black population.

And in a way, the Democrats do have a reason to worry about the black vote. The Obama presidency blindsided Jews and Democrats to this fact. Blacks overwhelmingly voted for Obama, and it seemed like Democrats had an effortless lock on the black vote. And yet, it's possible that black support for the Democrats actually eroded from 2008 to 2016 despite their record support for Obama. After all, the Democrats increasingly became the party of the rich, the privileged, the gentrifiers, the great replacers(with mass immigration replacing not only whites but black Americans), and globo-homo. Indeed, but for his race, the Obama presidency was most memorable for its globo-homo glitz. In a way, Obama was the 'first gay president'. And even more than Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, he was a tool and invention of Jews, therefore the 'first Jewish president'. He tried to salvage his black credentials with BLM near the end of his second term, but Michael Brown was too much of a hard sell and the craziness led to Dallas shootings of white policemen. (Of course, no one took a knee for the dead cops.)

In 2016, Hillary lost narrowly largely because the black vote wasn't out in force for her. And Biden, the favorite of the Establishment(along with Kamala), got the nomination because of black votes in the South. So, 2020 victory hinged heavily on the black vote and black complicity in election rigging. And this time, Jews felt they needed to enter into a real bidding war for black loyalty. In the past against milquetoast GOP candidates, the Democrats need not worry too much about the black vote. But there was the chance that Trump might shave off just enough black vote to push him over the top. If Jews and Democrats took the black vote for granted, they had to jealously guard it and bribe it with lavish prizes in 2020. And that's why the George Floyd and BLM thing got so out of control. Of course, Jews hate Trump because his swaggering style had an awakening effect on White America, and BLM & Floyd Cult were also to reinforce the 'white guilt' mechanism.

Anyway, as the saying goes, "Why pay for something when you can get it for free?" And that's how Jews and Democrats had come to feel about the black vote. As blacks were so resolutely pro-Democratic and anti-GOP, it didn't require much effort to keep blacks voting for the Party. Black votes were essentially free, and of course, it was even more so with Obama. Even if Obama didn't do much for blacks, his blackness had blacks voting for him as a 'bro'.
But post-Obama was like a rude awakening for blacks. They were happy to have a brotha in the White House for eight years, but when the jig was up, blacks were feeling like Janet Jackson singing, "What have you done for me lately?" Obama yrs were mostly about gentrification, more mass immigration, more globo-homo, and etc. Indeed, it seemed as if black issues were pushed to the rear in favor of not only homos but freaking trannies. Also, Obama didn't say anything about policies like Stop-and-Frisk and, if anything, mostly seemed in be in cahoots with the urban yuppie gentrifier class. In a way, all this BLM hysteria is about Jews and libby-dib elites trying to distract blacks from the fact that THEY did most to lock up record number of blacks, replace blacks with immigrants, favor globo-homo over black issues, and have the IDF teach US police a few tricks on how to control the colored folks.
Obama years to blacks were, in a way, sort of like Reagan years to True Conservatives and the Clinton years to True Liberals. Because Reagan was president for 8 yrs(and George H.W. Bush for 4 more yrs), it seemed as if Conservatism really won, but during that period, the US became more soulless and less socially conservative. And while the Clinton years seemed like the triumph of Good Ole Liberalism and boomer idealism, it was actually a time of hyper-capitalism and massive deregulation. It took the passing of the Reagan-Bush era for conservatives to finally wake up and realize nothing had been conserved. And it took the end of the Clinton Era for liberals to realize how Clinton had been the tool of the chamber of commerce and the rise of the oligarchs. And it took the end of the Obama era for blacks to wake up and realize, "Sheeeeeeeiiiit, we ain't got nothing in them eight fa**oty years."

And this explains why certain segments of the black population were receptive to Trump in 2016. Obamagic had had a sandman effect on them. They were asleep thinking a brotha was in charge when, in fact, the trends during the Obama years favored the urban yuppie class, the Wall Street oligarchs, and globo-homo types. In a way, this is the danger of having 'your guy' in office. His position creates the impression that your side is on top when, very likely, it is losing out to other forces obfuscated by the false comfort of 'your guy' being on top. Blacks felt a post-Obama funk as his presidency wound down. After Obama, blacks were no longer interested in a white leader. Also, there wasn't another black candidate around that could appeal to white voters, which were crucial to Obama's wins as a Nice Negro. Then, it's understandable why Trump's message of America First had a certain appeal to blacks who feel they themselves should be favored over immigrants, and this sentiment goes back to Booker T. Washington who appealed to American elites to end immigration and hire blacks for jobs.

So, in a long while, Jews and Democrats actually had to fight for black votes and hearts & minds. While they could rest assured that the great majority of blacks would still vote Democratic, they feared that Trump might shave off just enough black votes to win a second term. Or not enough blacks might show up to vote, which is why Covid hysteria was useful to carry out election fraud on an unprecedented scale.
Anyway, to win over blacks in 2020, Jews went crazy in the bidding war. For a long time, it was understood that the GOP wouldn't even try to win over black votes. GOP would do the bare minimum to look 'un-racist', and Democrats could be assured of the black vote. But Trump made a real play for the black vote, and this meant that the Democrats couldn't rely on the old tricks once again and rest on their laurels. They had to bid up higher and higher in the Afro-auction. Jews took no chances. What they did for Michael Brown wasn't enough. And BLM-as-movement wasn't enough. George Floyd had to be sanctified. Not merely a victim but a saint. And BLM was transformed from righteous rage to rapturous religion. Jews and Democrats pulled all the stops in showering blacks with glittering prizes.

So, if the Black Vote would have fetched $1,000 in past auctions, the bidding wars in 2020 raised it to about a million dollars. Jews did for BLM what some people did for Bitcoin. Made it rise through the roof. If Hillary had won in 2016 and if she ran for re-election against someone like Jeb Bush or Rick Santorum, none of this would have been necessary. Jews and Democrats could have rested assured that the black votes would be there. Also, it wouldn't be the end of the world if Jeb Bush or his ilk won because he's such a total wussy cuck. But Jews truly hated Trump and what he stood for, and they were willing to DO ANYTHING to unseat him. Indeed, what Jews pulled off in 2020 is like what South Korea did with the steal in the 1988 Olympics. It was obvious Roy Jones clearly won the match, but SK wanted the gold. People always knew there was corruption in the Olympics, but they thought there's no way South Korea would pull something so low, so obvious, so foul IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE WORLD. But yep, their provincial pride overrode sense and decency, and so, the steal happened right in front of eyes of the world.
Approaching 2020, many wondered what Jews would do to beat Trump. After all, they pulled all sorts of dirty tricks with 'Russia Collusion', 'Ukraine scandal', and other BS. But few people thought Jews would go totally crazy and pull off Covid nuttery and BLM lunacy just to win an election. But they did just that in front of the whole world. Jews have no sense of limits in having their way. But because Jews control the media and top institutions, they fooled just enough people and got away with it. Unlike South Korea that fooled no one, Jews were able to fool so much of the world with their utter BS. But then, even people who were not fooled nevertheless gladly went along with it because they've been led to think they're the 'best and the brightest', therefore ANYTHING is justified in wresting back control from Trump the Nazi and the Deplorables(even though the people in charge in the Trump White House were the same Israel-Firsters).

In a way, blacks have much to thank Trump. Thanks to Trump, Jews and Democrats went all in to win back the blacks. Even Covid hysteria was put aside to let BLM run riot. Blacks got both the spiritual prize as the holiest race and the material prize as they got to run wild and loot and steal. Indeed, even as their stores were being stripped clean by crazy Negroes, the 'woke' companies were singing paeans to BLM under the guidance of Jews who control the gods. The Jewish Mind uses the Black Body to attack whites, body and soul.

If not for Trump, all this attention and adulation wouldn't have been showered upon blacks. Blacks became especially precious in 2020 precisely because Jews feared that record number of blacks might vote for the Orange Man. Of course, Jews know the real truth. They know George Floyd was just a scumbag who died of drug overdose(like so many white working class), and they know Derek Chauvin is a victim of legal lynching. It's like Jews knew Russia Collusion thing was a hoax but pushed it just the same. And they attacked Trump on the Ukraine scandal because it was really ruinous to Biden, the real crook involved with regime in Ukraine installed by US-instigated coup. The real problem for Jews wasn't that Trump was 'racist' but that he came across as least 'racist', at least when it came to blacks. (When it came to Mexicans and Chinese, it was a different story.)

In a way, we see a pattern here. Jews are a 'jealous god' and didn't want Trump to take any credit. They didn't want Trump to take credit for ending the war in Afghanistan, so they delayed it... until Biden could take credit. And notice how Jews are now talking with Russians to arrive to some agreement. The very Jews who howled about Trump being a puppet of Putin are now dealing with Russia. Again, Jews didn't want Trump to take any credit in world affairs. What they shamed Trump for doing, they are doing it themselves. It's like the Kate Beckinsdale character in THE LAST DAYS OF DISCO. She says she could never date a guy in advertising but it's really to dissuade a friend from dating a guy that SHE wants. Jews will tell you not to do something, but when you choose not to, they do it and reap the rewards for themselves.

American culture and politics have devolved into a ritual of appeasing Jews, homos, and blacks. Wall Street bailouts, Wars for Israel, globo-homo mania, tranny nuttery, BLM riots, Floyd cult, and etc. This is no way to have a healthy society. But as the fish rots from the head, Jews deserve the most blame for leading America by the nose into the abyss. And yet, all we get from conzos is 'Muh Israel' and "Please don't call me 'racist-wacist'."

BIDEN'S SLEW OF JEWS - Brother Nathanael

How Jewish Power rewarded Black Collusion in the 2020 Coup against Trump with a variation of ROLL THE DRUNK: "Roll the Chink" or "Eggroll the Drunk" — How both whites and yellows in the US are now worthless cucks of Jews

THE TRUTH ABOUT ASIAN ATTACKS AND THE MASSAGE PARLOR SHOOTING

The Jewish-Black attack on Asians is like the game of ROLL THE DRUNK in Sergio Leone's ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA. In the movie, the young delinquents do a job for the local boss, and they are allowed to ‘roll a drunk’, i.e rob him of his belongings.

The unspoken agreement between Jewish elites and black thugs was something like ‘Roll the Chink’ or maybe it should be called ‘Eggroll the Drunk’. Jews needed special black activism and collusion in 2020 to defeat Trump, and blacks delivered with massive corruption at the polls. Also, with BLM rallies and riots, Trump’s America was made to look like a failed state. Blacks delivered the goods for the Jews, and so, as a reward, they got to ‘roll the drunk’ as Jewish Power, which controls the institutions, instructed the police to stand down and let blacks loot and pillage as they pleased, especially from immigrant groups. Chinese were bound to be one of the primary victims because they’ve been one of the main immigrant groups in urban areas like New York and San Francisco for some time. While some Chinese became rich in America, many remain still relatively poor and reside in run-down urban areas in close proximity to blacks. As they are a smaller and weaker people, they are easy prey for black predators. Also, as China/Chinese have been vilified by both the globalists and the nationalists(and as Chinese aren’t articulate or forceful voices in the media — Andrew Yang, what a joke), they don’t have much in the way of moral defense or vocal presence. Though the attacks are mostly by blacks, the powers-that-be conveniently blame ‘white supremacism’ and let blacks(and Jews) off the hook. But then, Asian-American elites conform to the bogus narrative as most of them are little more than roasted Peking Cuck, aka yellow dogs who go along with the Power.

This BLM stuff has been great for Jews. It’s been like killing three birds with one stone.

1. By riling up black rage, Jews energized blacks against Donald Trump and motivated the white ‘virtue-signalers’ to hate the Deplorables even more. Also, by funding and promoting BLM, Jews effectively silenced black gripes against Jews who led gentrification, increased policing, and mass-immigration to push blacks out prior to 2020.

2. By making blacks go nuts once again, Jews effectively weakened America’s opposition to mass immigration. Many Americans now look at black violence of the past year and think, ‘better immigrants than these crazy blacks’.

3. By associating Jewish Power with BLM, Jews created the impression that Jews are the biggest champions of social justice and human rights(as blacks have been idolized as a holy people). Via the association, Jews gained a free hand against Palestinians and Arabs. Jews can destroy countless Arab and/or Muslim lives but say, “BLM is our friend, so how can we be ‘racist’?”

No wonder people used the term ‘dirty Jews’.

This is why the prospect of a white-yellow alliance will always be just a pipe-dream. It may work between Russia and China because they act as sovereign nation-states. But it can’t work in the US because both whites and yellows lack agency and independence. Both are worthless cucks. Whites suck up to Jews and revere blacks. This is true even of white conzos. Trumpsters scapegoat Chinese for everything, and white conzos resent Asian gains in education and jobs. As for yellows, they are a bunch of status-hungry turdy dorks who look over their shoulders and cater to whomever has the most power and prestige. So, most yellows are puppets of Jews and globo-homo. Utterly worthless. Asians in US are willing to serve the Power and be good dogs. Chinese in China act with some degree of pride and agency. Not so with yellows in the West(or in the satellite states like Japan, S Korea, and Taiwan. Utterly cucky wucky to US power that is now about Jews using globo-homo and BLM.)

In a nutshell, Jews have been using mass immigration to weaken both whites and blacks. Mass immigration of non-whites, especially from Latin America, Asia, and Middle East, have been undermining the power of GOP as the white party. Also, mass immigration meant cities filling up with peoples far less violent than blacks, who got pushed aside. But in 2020, Jews needed black help, and so, they reversed their favoritism and allowed blacks to run riot and carry out pogroms against immmigrant communities in exchange for black collusion in favor of the Democrats. That's how Jews play the game. Dirty Jews. Jews play all sides against one another. When Jews say 'diversity is our strength', they really mean it's to their advantage to play divide-and-rule among the diverse goy populations.

Problems of Rush Limbaugh & the Delusions of Dittoheads — The False Dichotomy of 'Right-Wing' Capitalism vs 'Left-Wing' Socialism

Did Rush Limbaugh really make a difference?

Ironically, Limbaugh paved the way for the triumph of the New Liberals who should now be called Uberalls as they stand for Shlomo-Globo hegemony uber alles. Maybe, Limbaugh should be called a 'Limberal' given he unwittingly lent a hand to the Globerals and Uberalls in their total usurpation of power. How was Limbaugh a tool in this?

He was a total cheerleader for US corporations, 'free trade', 'private enterprise', Wall Street, Las Vegas, and money-money-money on the supposition that those are intrinsically 'conservative' forces. His was a pro-rich message though his main appeal was to the rubes. Thus, he helped create the situation of "What's the Matter with Kansas", i.e. so many American social conservatives who were have-lesses supporting policies that favored the have-mores and have-lot-mores in the mistaken belief that Big Money was on the side of Americanism.
Perhaps, Limbaugh's blind spot could be forgiven as his formative years were the Cold War when global conflict according to the US Narrative boiled down to God, Enterprise, & American Patriotism versus Godless Communism & Anti-Americanism. Also, when Rush Limbaugh was young, the face of capitalism was General Motors and good ole boys making things in factories. And the GOP was powerful in California — none other than Ronald Reagan won twice there as governor and dominated in 1980 and 1984 — , and the initial high-tech start-ups had many libertarian-leaning individuals who preferred GOP's pro-entrepreneur policies.

Limbaugh was blind, willfully or otherwise, as to how much things had changed in American Capitalism with the ascendancy of boomers(among whom Jews were especially powerful). And had he inspected matters more carefully, he would have realized that Eastern Bloc communist nations were, in more ways than one, culturally and socially more conservative than the Liberal West(that, under the power of PC, became both less conservative and less liberal, rejecting both traditional values and civil liberties in favor of the Tri-Supremacist Idolatry of Jews, Negroes, and Homos enshrined as the Holy Three). Limbaugh clung to Cold War formulations of the Left vs Right, and his continuing influence after the Cold War turned out to be corrosive. In his twilight, he warmed to Donald Trump, but it was too little too late(and besides Trump turned out to be a clown).

In the 1990s, a boomer civil war broke out between Rush Limbaugh(and Newt Gingrich) and Billy Boy Clinton(and Jews securing their position as the new ruling elites). With the defeat of George H.W. Bush, the so-called Greatest Generation's fall from power(and grace) was swift, and the boomers, biggest generation in US history, took total power(though Clinton did appoint some of the older generation). Bob Dole was useless in 1996, and the death of Richard Nixon marked an end of an era.
According to Limbaugh, Bill Clinton and his crowd represented the Radical Sixties, Socialism, and Anti-Americanism. But the real conflict wasn't about capitalism vs socialism but about trying to win over Big Capital. Under Bill Clinton, the Democrats had pretty much given up on Big Labor and fixed their gaze on Wall Street, Big Tech, and other Big Money players as the main prizes. It was as if both Limbaugh and Clinton in drag were doing lap dance for Bill Gates and the like. They were both going 'me so horny, we sucky sucky long time'.
In time, Boomer Big Money went with the Democrats, something American Conservatives were reluctant to face until the likes of Ann Coulter and Tucker Carlson finally began to gripe about traitorous Chamber of Commerce and 'woke capital'. But even now, so many American Conzos yap about 'socialism', 'communism', and blah blah. Right, the mega-billionaires of Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Hollywood, Wall Street, and etc. are all a bunch of 'communists'. And those vain homos and trannies funded by the super-rich represent what? Leninism and Stalinism?
Bill Clinton, a sleazebag but an astute observer of human nature, understood that the rich aren't only materially greedy but morally vain and status-anxious. As long as Democratic policies were overly punitive on the wealthy, many among the rich would reluctantly stick with the stuffy-and-square GOP as the pro-business party. But once the Democratic Party became reasonably pro-business, many(even most) rich folks would come over to the Democrats(even if GOP remained more pro-business) because the Democrats control the gods and own the 'cool'. Especially with Jewish control of academia and media, the gods of the US became the Sacred Semites, Noble Negroes, and increasingly Holy Homos. As the Democratic Party was the home of most Jews and blacks, it held the moral high ground. And as Jewish Power made homos ever holier, the young generation increasingly went with the Democrats as the happy globo-homo party.

Of course, the GOP had given up 'racism' long ago, but why would blacks accept racial equality from the GOP when they can get racial sanctity from the Democrats? Some Jews, as 'Neocons', did join the GOP because it was even more pro-Zionist than the Democratic Party, but it was a matter of inches(and besides, the Neocons were merely using the GOP without offering much in return: "I eat your lunch, and I eat my lunch."). If the Democratic Party was 200% for Israel, the GOP claimed it was 210% for Israel. It hardly made a difference. Also, despite GOP's ultra-hardline support for Israel, many American Conservatives opposed or or were at least less enthused about Jewish-favored policies in the US, such as gun-banning, more mass-immigration, anti-white rhetoric, Christianity-bashing, and promotion of globo-homo. Indeed, GOP's extreme obeisance to Israel and Zionism was really a crutch, a desperate compensation for its disfavor among most Jews. If anything, it betrayed GOP's anxiety as the party of disdain among Jews. In a sane world, those attacked by Jews should attack them back, but as Jews became holy in the US, you had to praise them and seek their approval EVEN when they attacked you. As the GOP couldn't win favor from Jews on domestic issues, it went full-steroids on Israel. GOP gushed as if Jews are the very best, and yet most Jews stuck with the Democrats. If indeed Jews are the best yet most remained with the Democratic Party, didn't it imply that Democrats are morally superior? After all, it seems a happier home for the Very Best.

Anyway, as the party of the three most 'sacralized' groups(of Jews, blacks, and homos), the Democrats had a decisive moral advantage over the GOP, and this state of affairs hasn't changed after four years of Donald Trump whose message was, "I love Negroes, even as they riot and loot! I love Jews even as they ram me in the arse! And, Trannies can use women's room at Trump Tower." Rich people love money but are also anxious about their reputation, and as the Jews/Democrats controlled the gods, most rich folks moseyed on over to the Democratic Party. Besides, it was also the party of big Hollywood stars and rock stars, thus more fashionable and 'cool'. In contrast, GOP was associated with 'racist' redneck Neo-Confederate South & 'homophobes' and Nashville hillbillies. (Its moralism came down to Ann Coulter and Dinesh D'Souza yapping about how the Democrats are the 'real racists' because the KKK members were historically Democratic.) And when the Jew-run media made Trump and 'Deplorables' out to be Worse-than-Hitler and the new nazis, most rich folks(shallow and vain) wanted nothing to do with it. And the likes of Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney know only one trick: Try to win back the rich with even more tax cuts and other cucktivities.

Limbaugh of the Cold War mentality thought that the triumph of global capitalism was synonymous with victory for conservatism against Godless Communism and leftover radicalism from the Sixties, but the success of everything he'd championed came to mean the death knell of American Conservatism(and also of American Liberalism as the current power is anything but liberal in the traditional or even radical sense). The great irony is that Limbaugh lost precisely because he won. The Big Money that he so idolized won many times over, and its power led to censorship of conservatives, deplatforming of patriots, denial of financial services to rightists, defamation of people like him, and the rise of global-gangster-fascism(as opposed to good humanist fascism). Limbaugh and the dittoheads assumed that Big Capital was at war with Big Government, and the triumph of the former would ensure more liberty, more freedom, and more patriotism. Actually, the result was the fusion of Deep Pockets and Deep State. Also, Limbaugh and his ilk hoped that Jews could be wooed over to Conservatism because Jews are rich and GOP is 210% pro-Israel(than merely 200% that the Democrats are). They failed to realize that Jews have an agenda all their own. Jews weren't looking to pick sides but take over both parties and manipulate them to Jewish supremacist ends.

In the end(and from the beginning), Limbaugh was more style than substance, and Trump turned out to be no different. For all his maverick playacting, he cared more about money, success, fame, and celebrity than integrity and truth. Though he stood up to the GOP on occasion, he was more often than not a reliable cheerleader and whore for all its destructive policies.

Could Limbaugh have made a difference? Yes, but he missed the chance. Looking back, the most prescient presidential candidate of the last fifty years was Ross Perot whose campaign took on both the GOP and the Democratic Party as the tweedle dee and tweedle dum of globalism and 'free trade'. Though Perot was far from perfect and a rather unstable personality, he was more right than wrong about the dangers posed to American sovereignty by the rise of globalism and the New World Order. Because the GOP was more invested in 'free trade' than the Democrats back then, Perot was hit harder by the Republicans. Limbaugh, a Reagan Romantic of the Cold War mindset, joined with the GOP in mercilessly mocking not only Perot's looks and personality but his warnings and policies. Rush, the attack dog of the GOP, assured all the dittoheads across the fruited plains(soon to become tutti-fruity plains) to denounce Perot and go with George H.W. Bush, 'free trade', and New World Order policies.
Thus, Limbaugh missed the boat. Another chance came with Patrick Buchanan's remarkable speech at the 1992 GOP convention where he spoke for the common man and the American Worker threatened by globalist 'free trade'. Again, Limbaugh reliably sided with the GOP and repeated all the talking points about how Walmart and the like are the wave of the future, and the American Worker had nothing to fear and nothing to lose and had everything to gain. Or, maybe they can learn to code and become big earners in High-Tech.
And of course, 'true conservatives' know that capitalists are all such swell fellows, mostly patriots and natural conservatives(or at the very least libertarians committed to small government and liberty). They would never betray the GOP for all it has done for them with lower taxes, de-regulation, and the like. Limbaugh and dittoheads were fooling themselves.

While capitalists are surely people of talent, drive, ambition, creativity, and even vision, the world of money isn't exactly one of integrity or loyalty. As it's mainly driven by materialism and status-anxiety, loyalty and integrity are the last thing on the mind of capitalists. Capitalism is useful and productive but shouldn't be the core of any meaningful identity, ideology, or value system. Like Michael Corleone says in THE GODFATHER 2, "all our people are businessmen... their loyalty is based on that..." One may admire businessmen for their ability but never mistake it for integrity.

If Limbaugh had taken a nationalist-populist stance in support of Ross Perot and Pat Buchanan, perhaps he would have been booted off 'conservative talk radio' that, more often than not, was a propaganda wing of Zionists and the GOP, much like most of so-called MSM is little more than Ministry of Information for the Democratic Party and ADL. Still, he would have been a man of integrity, and had he overcome the obstacles with a populist message, he and his following could have served as a formidable counter-force against globalism pushed not only by the GOP but the Democrats.
But, by working with the GOP to crush people like Perot and Buchanan, Limbaugh unwittingly strengthened the future Democrats who would turn out to be the main beneficiaries of 'free trade', deregulation, Big Tech monopoly, and anarcho-oligarcho-tyrannism. Limbaugh banked on the false hope that triumph of New Capital would ensure dominance of the GOP and American Conservatism. And most dittoheads fell for the myth that the power struggle was about American Capitalism & Conservatism(and Neocons & Israel) versus International Socialism & Liberalism(and all those 'Anti-Semites' eager to throw Israel under the bus) when, in fact, the real tug-of-war between GOP and the Democratic Party was for the 'hearts and minds'(or wallets and vanity) of the rich donor class.

The sad irony is that the rich capitalist oligarchic class won bigger than ever(exactly as Limbaugh and dittoheads wished), and it was this very class(especially dominated by Zio-Globalist Jews) that waged total war on American Nationalism, the white race, Christianity, and populist-conservatism. But American Conzos learned nothing. Again with Obama's win in 2008, there was more nonsensical talk about 'socialism'! True, Obama had links with certain radical figures from the Sixties, some of them Jewish, but most of them had moved on from communism to Zionist-capitalist-supremacism. (Besides, Neocons had Trotskyite backgrounds.) Wall Street was bailed out under Obama, the puppet of the Jews, and Jews got even richer when Main Street took it up the arse. And it was Big Capital that funded globo-homo and tranny-wanny nonsense. It was the capitalists who promoted 'gay burgers'. And it was the capitalists at Chick-Fil-A who, despite so much support from the conservative consumers, caved under Jewish Capitalist pressure and became Dick-Fil-Ass. And while uber-capitalist banks were shutting down accounts of conservatives and rightists, some of the biggest corporations were pumping many millions, even billions, into groups like BLM and SPLC. It was super-rich Hollywood Jews and Silicon Valley Zionists who pumped record cash into Georgia to ensure Democratic Senatorial wins. Joe Biden raised record money in 2020 thanks to Big Capital and super-rich Jews. And Big Capital conspired with the Deep State and Big Media to turn 2020 into a hellhole with Covid nonsense and BLM nuttery just to punish America for having elected Trump. So, the notion that capitalism is automatically conservative was a boomer myth, a byproduct of Cold War mentality.

But the kind of 'conservatism' set by Limbaugh and dittoheads failed to see the big picture because it was stuck on framing the world in terms of capitalism = conservatism versus socialism = liberalism. What's-the-Matter-with-Kansas was a case of "What's the matter with Limby-Dim and the Dittoheads?" Now, it's true that Limbaugh's reach and influence waned in the age of the internet, but much of the talking points remained. So, Steven Crowder the chowder-head still thinks the big enemy is 'socialism'. Andrew Torba, though laudable as founder of Gab and defender of free speech, gripes about 'communism', ROTFL. (China may be ruled by the CCP, but China gave up communism long ago... or haven't they heard? CCP today is about as Maoist as the current Democrats are Pro-Confederate and Pro-Working-Class.) And so many even in the Dissident Right speak of THE LEFTISTS. Anyone with sense would have realized long ago that true leftism is deader than conservatism, though it may not seem that way on the surface as radical 'wokeness' seem to be everywhere. But it's all just labels over trivia and trifles. Jewish supremacist capitalist-Zionism hides behind the 'leftist' label to create the false impression that its side is about 'equity' and 'justice' when it's totally about supremacism, hierarchy, hegemony, and privilege. If the Democrats are really about equal justice for all, what's with all their 'Muh Israel' catechisms and submission to Zionist Jews and total support for More Wars for Zion?

Alt Right could have introduced something new, but idiot Richard Spencer and his retardo crew decided to larp as Nazis and fall into the enemy's trap, which made it even harder for Trump to try something different.

At any rate, one thing Perot got right was going beyond the stunted worldview of left vs right. The Reform Party was a third party that appealed to both rightist and leftist sentiments. Though Nazism 2.0 turned out to be insane with its imperialism and wars, Nazism 1.0 was essentially sound precisely because it combined rightism with leftism. National Socialism was about German Pride but also about the German worker, the backbone volk of the nation. Perot instinctively understood this, and free-thinking Democrats and Republicans were willing to give him a chance.
It attempted a counter-convergence against the convergence happening within both the GOP and the Democratic Party. After the end of the Cold War, the establishment elites of both parties were converging on 'free trade', globalism, the gods of PC, and total sucking up to Jews. For all the bitterness between Billy Boy Clinton and Newt Gingrich, they were totally agreed on More for Wall Street and More for Big Money. Perot's challenge envisioned a different kind of convergence. Not among the elites but among the masses. The American People, instead of being divided by and manipulated with the false dichotomy of 'left' vs 'right', would converge as a broad mass of patriots in defense of national sovereignty and economic justice. Convergence of the people against the convergence of the elites. If not for Perot's instability and the dirty tricks played by both parties(especially by the GOP), it's possible Perot could have changed the course of US history. And Limbaugh could have been part of something truly remarkable but he opted to be the lapdog of the GOP and cheered on the Walmartians.

A third party is useless if it appeals only to one side. Another 'liberal' party will merely take votes away from the Democrats, ensuring victory for the GOP, and another 'conservative' party will shave votes from the GOP, ensuring victory for the Democrats. The only chance for a Third Party is to win over disillusioned people from both sides. Also, its message must be both left and right. After all, there is much that is good about leftism(without which Western progress is inconceivable) and much that is good about rightism(without which there is no civilizational continuity and stability). Conservatism allows for tradition, caution, and continuance. Liberalism allows for novelty, experimentation, and daring. It's like how evolution works. Without mutations, organisms would have remained the same. And yet, most mutations are harmful and must be rejected. Without leftism, there is just moribund conservatism, and many civilizations grew weak and weary as a result, like Ancient Egypt and Byzantium. The West made great leaps because of the revolutionary spirit. And yet, without the stabilizing gyrational force of conservatism, leftism can turn cancerous and crazy, mistaking every novelty as the 'most evolved' truth. Imagine an organism where the mutations take over. It will turn into Elephant Man.

Looking back on 2016, it would have been better for Trump to run as a third-party candidate. Because he ran as a Republican, he was compelled to play the 'rightist', thus needlessly alienating many people with leftist inclinations. Had he run on a combination of nationalism and socialism, he could have done so much more. Of course, had he won as a third party candidate in 2016, he would have been squeezed by both parties in Congress for four grueling years, but many more Americans would have been with him. Being alone with the people isn't the worst thing, and his tragedy would have been heroic. Instead, as a sham 'rightist' in a cucked GOP, the tragedy of 2020 was a clown-show, a farce.
Two realities decide the fate of America: JEWS CONTROL THE GODS and JEWS GIVE YOU MONEY. In the end, despite all his bluster, Rush Limbaugh bowed to the Jewish-controlled gods and took their money as Talk Radio Industry was controlled by Uber-Zionists.

RUSH - AN AMERICAN ICON

Transformation of Diversity Politics from Rule by Anglo-America to Rule by Judeo-America — How Jewish Power used Diversity to divide & rule over Goyim and then formulated New Terms of Goy Unity on terms favorable to Jewish Supremacism

The American Mythos of Anglo Pride

America was diverse from the beginning, predominantly Anglo but with other Northern European ethnicities, and it increasingly grew diverse as later newcomers were less Anglo or Northern European in general. There was also the large number of blacks, but they were sufficiently different to be considered and treated as a separate population, and this was even truer of the American Indians. More immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe and then finally from non-Western nations meant that the US would grow more diverse, which could also mean more divided.
Therefore, as counterbalance to the divisiveness wrought by diversity — even the American Civil War resulted from Diversity as an all-white South surely would NOT have seceded from the North; it did so because white Southerners feared the blacks and thought the whites in the North were agitating the Negroes — , the Anglo-American elites devised a formula for unity that roughly went as 'Principles for All, Pride for Us', i.e. the American Ethos would de-emphasize origin, race, ethnicity, color, religion, and etc. BUT the narrative of American Mythos would emphasize the vision, courage, foresight, ability, and wisdom of the Anglos. So, Americanism would appeal to all but reveal the Anglos as the true founders, builders, and settlers for all else for everything else to be possible. So, even as the US grew more diverse, dangers of division would be ameliorated by not only shared principles(in the Constitution) but shared respect for the Anglos as the First and Foundational Americans.

But Jews couldn't abide by that. Now, if Jews were a middling people with, say, an average IQ of 90 and possessed of a milder personality(than a pushy one with chutzpah coming out of their ears), they too would likely have abided by the Anglo Formula for Principles for All, Pride for Us(Anglos). After all, even though every non-Anglo group felt some degree of envy and resentment for the Anglos, there was more respect and admiration. It's like in the traditional Southwest, a Mexican might call an Anglo a 'damn gringo' behind his back but was ever ready to say "Si, Senor" when the Anglo boss needed the Mexican to do something, like saddle a horse in THE BIG COUNTRY. Same with the Negroes. For all their rage and loud talk, blacks on their own are like the Tataglias without the backing of Barzini in THE GODFATHER. Blacks on their own 'could never have outfought (white)Santino'. This is why blacks so eagerly pimp out to Jews. Not that they like Jews, but they know Jews place special value on blacks as bouncers and pimps.

Jews exploited the possibilities inherent in the promise of Principles-for-All in order to gain power over Anglo-Americans. Jews argued, "If the US is indeed all about equality and liberty, why was the history of America 'racist' and why was Free Speech restricted in one form or another?" Taking over the Law and Media, Jews pushed ever harder on civil liberties, especially as many Jews were radical, subversive, criminal, and/or pornographic. And under this pressure, the US did become freer than ever for awhile. Late 60s to the mid-80s were probably the golden age of Free Speech, not just in the US but in world history.

But as Jews aimed to grab more power and take over as the new ruling elites, they believed that both the politics of Pride and Principles as laid down by Anglo-America had to be altered. As long as the Pride of Narrative belonged to the Anglos, Jews would have to play a sidekick role in the American Mythos. Jews might even come to be seen as usurpers than rightful rulers.

Just like Christianity, though owing so much to Judaic tradition and Early Jews, defined itself against Jews as Christ-Killers — it was an effective way for Christians to wrest the rightful ownership of God from the Jews — , Jews felt they must villainize the white race(especially those of Northern European stock) in the American Mythos in order to conceive of a New Americanism where Jews and their allies/minions would be the true rightful owners of America.
Jesus was a Jew, but also the Son of God murdered by Jews, or so said the Christians. Gentiles took so much from Jews but blamed the Jews for the greatest crime conceivable, the killing of the Son of God. Likewise, Jews took so much from Anglo-America but felt compelled to stab its heart in order to lay claim to the New America. According to the New Jew Narrative, White Americans, despite having founded and built Early America, betrayed it like Judas betrayed Jesus: Whites talked a good talk but were really 'racist' & 'white supremacist' and crucified black jesus(though there isn't much talk of American Indians lately) while their racial brethren in Europe came to crucify the holy Jews as new christs. So, ultimately, White America is the Judas that betrayed the American Mythos, and the True Founding Fathers are the Immigrant Jews and the Blacks(and their proselytizing missionaries or missionfairies are the homos).

So, the Pride of Anglos had to be changed to Shame/Guilt of Anglos. And these emotions had to be a kind of Moral Pornography or 'Mornography', so relentless, aggressive, and overwhelming in its mind-fuc* that whites wouldn't dare stand up and say, "Wait a minute, you're going too far..." It explains why Jews promote stuff like MISSISSIPPI BURNING and 12 YEARS A SLAVE where southern whites males aren't merely flawed or bad but downright perverse & degenerate in their evil. It's beyond heroes and villains; it's about angels and monsters. So, the Pride of Anglos, which used to be a key unifying factor among diverse non-Anglo Americans went out the window. These days, the debate is about whether it's worth saving any statue or monument to Anglo-American heritage.

Now, what about the Principles? Would it still be Principles for All based on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? Initially, Jews took full advantage as stalwart champions of this ideal to protect Jewish radicalism/subversion/pornography and also to ensure the separation of the state from any expression of Christianity. But, as Jews amassed more power for themselves and noticed that others were critically taking notice of Jewish power, Jews began to change their tune and go the neo-Bolshevik route of altering the meaning of Free Speech whereby it became 'free' only if Jews approved of it.
Likewise, when Jews talk of 'democracy', they really mean outcomes favored by the Tribe. So, if a legitimate democratic process leads to an outcome disfavored by Jews, it's 'autocracy' or 'far right'. But if Jews pull dirty tricks to subvert the democratic process but get the result they prefer, it is 'democracy'. For Jews, both the ideas of Free Speech and Democracy are about Rule of Lawyers, not Rule of Laws. Whatever Jews say is the 'truth'.
As a result, the Ideal of Principles-for-All turned into Power-for-Us, the Jews. New America is essentially about Shame for Anglos and Power for Jews. Blackness is the bludgeon Jews use against whiteness, and Queertianity is the replacement for Christianity.

Under Anglo-American rule, the problems of increasing diversity was dealt with limiting immigration mostly to whites, ending mass immigration in the 1920s, and instituting Principles for All & Pride for Anglos. And it more-or-less worked... except with the Jews, but then, this was to be expected from a people who stubbornly maintained a separate identity and culture amongst majority Christians and Muslims over the many centuries. Also, among the various newcomers, Jews alone had the combination of identity, ability, neurosis, and cunning to fully exploit American Meritocracy for their own aggrandizement and apotheosis.

Once Jews secured their place in the New Order, they concocted a grand plan of not only takeover but permanence. After all, in the game of king-of-the-hills, the king is usually pushed aside by challengers, old and new. If a people as prestigious, privileged, and powerful as the Anglo-Americans could be pushed off the hill, it could happen to Jews as well. Jews felt that, as long as the US remained a white majority nation, whites might finally come to realize Jews are a hostile/subversive bunch up to no good(not least because the better Jews, for sake of tribal, were too often hesitant to go after the bad Jews). Therefore, Jews needed to bring about even more Diversity to secure permanent power, and this time, the newcomers would be non-white.

Jews figured there would be less chance of non-whites uniting with whites against Jews than whites uniting with other whites against Jews. After all, blacks had been in the US for a long time, but white/black tensions were never resolved. Jews pushed for more immigration on account of 'Diversity' and 'Multi-Culturalism' being advantageous to Jews. And indeed, it did lead to more divisions among the goyim in the 'culture war' that took off in the late 1980s. Jews were relieved by the sight of babelization among the goyim.
But, this wasn't entirely good for Jews either. After all, if Diversity means more division among various groups insisting on their distinct identities & narratives uber alles, that meant there could be no national unity to get anything done on a domestic, let alone global, scale. For Jews to use American Power effectively, all Americans had to be united around SOME themes even if remaining divided on others.
After all, in a truly multi-cultural system, most gentile groups would ask, "Why should I praise Jews and support Zionism when I am not Jewish, and besides, what Jews are doing to the Palestinians is like what white imperialists did to my folks long ago?" A much divided America would mean the goyim wouldn't be able to unite against the Jew, BUT it also meant they couldn't unite on ANY issue as each group would be into 'our identity' and 'our interests'. Furthermore, if Multi-Culturalism really meant each group should stick to its own culture and values, most cultures(especially non-white ones) would be anti-globo-homo, something pushed by Jews. Such would be an obstacle to the Jewish Agenda.
Jews needed the goyim divided on identity & color but needed their unity on certain matters to render them useful to Jews. It's like a metallurgist uses heat to pry metals apart but then remolds them into unified solid metal. The increasingly diverse peoples had to be brought together on key issues and agendas favored by Jews. (Of course, Jews only needed to win over the elites and 'spokesmen' of every group, and such status-driven types were easy to bribe and browbeat.) And what would the terms of re-unity be for the diverse goyim in the New America with Jews as top dogs. It obviously couldn't be the old terms of Pride for Anglos and Principles for All. It had to be Shame for Anglos so that Jews and non-whites(and cuck-whites) would all be united on Blaming Whitey as the Eternal Bogeyman.
The other term was Power for Jews(than Principles for All), but it had to be veiled as the goyim might recoil from brazen Jewish Supremacism? And this is why Jews couldn't hog all the prestige for themselves and favored two other groups, Homos and Blacks to form a triumvirate. Homos of all colors(white, black, brown, yellow, etc.) would create the rainbow-impression that the New Order is about equality for people of all colors. And as the black narrative in America came to define the struggle against 'racism', blackness would have significance beyond its racial identity. MLK and Mandela are like global symbols for struggle for justice in the way that Jesus, though Jewish of origin, came to symbolize Love for All Humanity. With such elevation, of course homos and blacks were fully onboard with the Jewish Agenda... on the understanding that the two groups would pretend to be the best of friends — notice how BLM activities prominently display 'gay' colors — and either totally support Jews or at least keep mum about the crimes of Zionism & Wars for Israel. One thing for sure, whether one is Pete Buttigieg, Joe Biden, or Barack Obama, you get rewarded big time if you kiss the Jewish Behind.

The end result hasn't been Multi-Culturalism where each and every identity/interest is of equal worth and equal time but the Tri-Supremacism of Tentpole Identities(or Idolatries) of Jews, blacks, and homos. So, if you're Jewish, black, or homo, you are 'made', but if not, you must seek 'social credit' points by sucking up to one, two, or all three of the Tentpole Identities.
Indeed, for all the talk of 'white privilege', a white person who sucks up to Jewgromo(Jewish-Negro-Homo) Idolatry is favored many times over than a non-white who sympathizes with BDS, condemns the Wars for Israel, or denounces 'gay' behavior. The blondest and most-blue-eyed white person who sucks up to Jews, waves the 'gay' flag, and/or flashes a BLM sign is far more likely to succeed than the nappiest blackest black who, unlike Barack Obama and Kamala Harris, dares to condemn Israel and champions Palestinians and other brown people being crushed by Zionism and its wars.
In other words, one's own race/color ultimately matters less than which race/color one sucks up to. A white person's 'white privilege' actually expands IF he sucks up to Jews, takes the knee for the Negro, and bends over for the homo. In contrast, a non-white's supposedly magical 'diversity' means next to nothing if he or she goes against the terms set by Jews. There are many whites in the Deep State because they suck up to Jews. In contrast, Tulsi Gabbard's mixed-race identity means NOTHING because she dared to upset Jews on foreign policy. Indeed, so-called Liberal Jews much prefer white GOP cucks like Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell over someone like Gabbard. What does that tell you? It's the politics and 'spirituality' of group-idolatry.

Paradoxically, America's anti-class attitudes turned society into more of a neo-class system, at least with the rise of globalism. Prior to the radical expansion of 'free trade', the US had essentially a National Capitalist economy where the middle classes and working classes had considerable leverage in the economy. With the vast majority of Americans identifying as 'middle class', it seemed as if US solved the problem of class conflict after WWII and during much of the Cold War. But with hyper-globalism and China/India entering the world economy, the American Middle Class and Working Class were threatened. Also, the ebbing away of any traditional sense of Americanism and with libertarianism ensconced as the new defining value of Establishment Conservatism, the individual mattered far more than the community, and one's worth was entirely the product of personal success. Thus, successful whites were more likely to feel closer to other successful individuals regardless of race or color, especially as whites were taught to believe white identity/solidarity is 'racist' and any notion of white folk/volk is 'nazi'. So, what did this neo-individualism lead to? The rise of the new uber class for whom status-conscious membership in the club means everything whereas the unsuccessful whites are dismissed as 'losers' or 'deplorables'. In a way, the elite goy attitude toward the masses came to resemble Jewish attitude toward goyim: Contempt and derision. (Jews needed to worry less about class because the majority of Jews were very successful, and besides, pride of identity/unity wasn't verboten among Jews and, if anything, a tribal obligation that was, furthermore, cheered on by goyim who would have denounced similar consciousness among their own kind.) It's no wonder Jews encouraged the spread of libertarian individualism among whites. 'Muh liberty' negated 'Our Community' among whites. Of course, Jews, blacks, and homos were, contra the whites, totally encouraged not only to boost their own identities but demand that other groups favor Jewishness, blackness, and homo-ness over their own identities & culture. A Muslim who hollers BLM is favored over a Muslim who shouts, 'Proud to be Muslim', and a Mexican who waves the 'gay' flag is favored over a Mexican waving the Mexican flag.

Anyway, that's how the new unity works in New America. It's no longer about diverse white ethnicities and non-whites being united on Principles for All and Pride for Anglos. Rather, the pride(even holiness) is hogged by Jews, Homos, & Negroes as the Tentpole identities that the lesser multi-culti identities are pressured to rally around. As for Principles, the hell with Americans striving to live up to the promise of the Constitution. Why, that would mean equal gun rights and speech rights for all Americans. A well-armed populace might rise up against tyranny. And a free-minded people might speak truth to power, which is mostly Jewish nowadays.
So, it must be about Power than Principles. And yet, Jews understand that most people will not discard Principles in favor of Tribal Power for Jews despite their special sympathy or reverence for the Jewish people. So, even though it's really all about control, Jews have worded their power-grab in the language of principles pertaining to 'hate speech' and 'white supremacism'. (Of course, goy 'liberals' have their own reasons for supporting Speech Control. Prior to the internet and especially social networks and live-streaming, most discourse-of-consequence happened in the big media, elite academia, and institutions of the learned, or indoctrinated. So, it was mostly the educated talking amongst themselves. But the internet and live-streaming made it possible for the Average Joe to have his say on equal terms, and oddly enough, the less educated Joes sometimes had more interesting things to say because, being unattached to industry or institution, they could speak their minds in the way that elites could not, at least if they were to hold their status and positions; paradoxically, the more power you gain, the less power you have to speak freely. With all the Average Joes saying that Liberal Princelings wear no clothes, naturally the 'liberals' want to control speech for the masses. Other than that, the New Cult of Wokewicz demands that all be properly reverential to the Holy Three of Jews, Homos, and Blacks. If Jews want to control speech to protect tribal power, 'liberals' want to control speech to preserve status & prestige.) The gall, the chutzpah, of these people. It's like the notorious Jewish Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev who rags on 'whiteness' as inherently 'racist' & 'supremacist' and must therefore be wiped out as an identity, but all of this is just projection because, if identity has been supremacist in conception and practice, it is Jewishness that says the Jewish soul, blood, and body are superior due to special blessing by the one and only God. So, Jews not only denied that other peoples have their own gods and insisted the God of the Jews is the only God for all the world and all of humanity, BUT this God made Jews better than all the rest. Jewish Supremacism is a jealous god that will simply not tolerate any other identity that has the potential of saying NO to Jewish Megalomania. This is why Jewish Power shames whiteness into paralysis so that it will serve Jewish Supremacism.

So, in summary, there was the problem of diversity that was solved under Anglo-American rule with Principles-for-All as ethos and Pride-for-Anglos as mythos.
But Jews brought about the second round of Diversity that led to yet another crisis of divisiveness. This served Jews well in having a goy populace that could not unite, but it posed the problem of each group being for itself than for any sense of common purpose. How could Jews rally the diverse goyim into serving the Jewish Agenda(as the New Americanism) if every group says 'Our Identity Uber Alles'? And so, Diversity had to be re-united under the New American themes of Sacred Semites, Noble Negroes, and Holy Homos. Therefore, whatever differences your people may have with other peoples in the US, just remember that it is the 'patriotic' duty of ALL AMERICANS to bow down before the Jews, kneel before Negroes, and cheer for homos & trannies. And spit on whitey.

WE KNOW HOW TO MAKE AMERICA STRONG - American Renaissance

Why the Politically Correct Wokemons are a bunch of Bloodhounds — How 'Liberals' are for PC Uber Alles, therefore should be called Uberalls — Modern Man wants to Feel Free but Not Be Free, and how Jewish Power Exploits this Contradiction

Human Hounds of Woke Mentality: Jews provide them with the 'hate scent' and they go crazy tracking it 24/7.

Politically Correct Wokemons are really just two-legged bloodhounds with mindsets closer to canines than humans. They ain't nothing but hound dogs.

They can’t see, hear, find, or think on their own. They are profoundly uncurious and uncritical. No wonder their minds must be directed by OTHERS who control courses in Critical Theory. Critical Theory fills the mental(and 'spiritual') void of those who can’t be independently critical of anything. They must be TOLD and DIRECTED what to revere and what to revile. They are like dogs whose primary craving is confirmation from the master.

That’s why proglodytes are just a bunch of hound dogs. With no agency and agenda of their own, dogs rely on the master for the scents to track down. Once given a whiff of the scent, they run after it with blind, single-minded obsession. But then, what is the ultimate payoff for this kind of behavior among dogs? Dogs evolved to seek approval from the top/alpha member of the pack, which would be the human master for most dogs. Dogs befriend and play with other dogs but revere and nearly worship the human master as the alpha-god. At the end of the day, bloodhounds want approval from the master for having tracked down the scent. They will go to hell and back in pursuit of the scent to gain approval, which is what really gives 'meaning' to their existence. Likewise, nothing is more satisfying to a wokemon hound than having hunted down ‘bad thought’ and being approved by his/her master, the Tri-Supremacism of Jews, Homos, and Negroes.

Many more people attend college than ever before, but so many of them are on the dumb-side. In a saner world, far fewer people would attend elite institutions. But as colleges now fill up with tons of mediocrities and dummies(made worse by Affirmative Action), there is a much larger pool of morons for radical or Jewish professors to manipulate into states of frenzy. These students certainly can’t think for themselves. They grew up under rootless parents, were weaned on TV & junk culture, and were indoctrinated with PC education. As they can’t really think, they prefer ideological dogma or idol-worship. That way, all they need do is memorize and regurgitate a few catechisms & slogans and wave globo-homo or BLM banner to feel justified and holier-than-thou.

Just like bloodhounds, these sniffers or sniffs rely on others provide them with 'scents' to track down. Then, they chase after Fugitive Thoughts that refuse to be chained to plantation-mentally overgrown with with cotton-picking narratives.
Of course, the wokemon hounds sometimes get out of control, beyond what the master ordered. It’s like over-zealous bloodhounds can become lost in their maniacal drive to find the scent somewhere, anywhere. Likewise, once a wokemon hound is provided with scent of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, or ‘homophobia’, he or she tries to sniff it out of ANYTHING and even begins to hallucinate the 'scent', like outlandishly bogus-KKK-sightings that took place at Oberlin and some other 'liberal' colleges. THAT one ‘scent’ becomes an all-consuming passion. And when he or she thinks it's been tracked down, he or she runs off to the higher authority and says, “LOOK, I FOUND IT”, and expects a pat on the head by the master. Good doggy, and here’s a biscuit. And for some who are so eager for approval and doggy biscuits but have a hard time tracking down the 'scent' in real life, there is always the option of the 'hate hoax' where the evil 'scent' is created out of the thin air.
One key difference between white PC hounds and black-homo-Jewish PC hounds is the former seeks approval from those up on the pedestal(mainly Jews, blacks, & homos), whereas the latter seeks further apologies & adulations from whites for further elevation on the pedestal. So, a white hound makes up a fake 'hate crime' to be petted on the head whereas someone like the Negro-Homo Jussie Smollett makes up a 'hate crime' to be kissed on the ass.

TUCKER CARLSON - HATE CRIME HOAXES ARE REAL AND DO DAMAGE TO SOCIETY!

What whites should do is cleverly toy with the ‘scent’ and make the hounds retrace it to their master. The Jewish master says go after ‘racism’, and the bloodhounds growl and run after whites(especially those who refuse to grovel, roll over, and play fetch). However, if whites label Zionism and Jewish Power as prime examples of ‘racism’ and supremacism, the wokemon bloodhounds may well circle back to their Jewish master. It's no wonder Jews fear and tremble at the mere thought of BDS. It leads the 'scent' right back to the Jews. Jews say, "Sniff this 'scent' of veddy veddy bad 'racism', so be a good dog and go after evil white 'racists'", but BDS says, "Look, Jews are the ones who reek most of 'racism' and supremacism in the Middle East."
Apartheid is too mild a concept(for what is happening in Israel and West Bank) - https://mondoweiss.net/2021/01/apartheid-is-too-mild-a-concept/

As long as Jews are providing anti-white 'scents' to woke hounds to track down fugitive white thoughts, it is utterly useless and retarded for whites say nothing but ‘Muh Israel’. When someone smears a certain scent on you and then provides the scent to dogs to track you down and tear you limb from limb, the last thing you should be doing is pledging undying loyalty, support, and protection to him. You should be clever and smear him with the very scent that he provided to the hounds.

The current wokemonism is all about Dollars & Scents. Jews got the dollars and provide the 'scents' to idiot hounds who can’t think on their own. They must be instructed by others as to what to worship, what to obey, what to hate, what to attack, and etc.
What is a FOOL? A fool is someone who is told two contradictory statements but mindlessly accepts both if only to win approval from the authority and/or out of fear of being ostracized for daring to question the illogic. It’s no wonder so many wokemon fools claim to oppose inequality but have no problem with the supremacism of Jews. Only a fool would believe in BLM, but fools will be fools.

One thing for sure, Jews figured out something about the contradictory way of human nature, and they've used this insight to manipulate and control the minds of the prog masses.

(1) Humans like to think themselves free and independent, speaking truth to power.

(2) Humans, at least most of them, are incapable of independent thought or criticism.

In other words, people(especially those with more education) want to feel free and think themselves a bit rebellious(or 'radical') but, on their own, don't know how to be critical and independent-minded. They are psychologically stuck inside the box. It's like so many would-be-artistic types like themselves as creative but don't know where to start and only lamely copy those precious few with the power of originality. Likewise, while dogs like to run free, they are utterly without sense of direction and purpose unless their master tells them what to hunt, pursue, or track down. Dogs want to run free but need the master to throw the stick for them to run after.

Jews understand and exploit this contradiction of human nature, i.e. that humans want to feel free but don't know how to be free. All said and done, when push comes to shove, people need to be told what to believe, what to cherish, what to reject, what to condemn. This is why true libertarianism repels most people as it requires each and every one of them to be his or her own person with his or her own thoughts and courses of action. It's no wonder that Jean-Paul Sartre, for all his individualist existentialism, ultimately settled for Marxism to lend meaning to his being.

People don't want to think of themselves as servile to authority or conservative(or chained to moribund tradition). They want to believe themselves to be free-spirited and independent-minded. But as most people cannot think or act on their own, they ultimately do lean on an authority to tell them what is what and what-is-to-be-done. The Jewish Trick is to offer that bit of authoritarianism but packaged as 'edgy', 'progressive', 'radical', 'liberating', 'empowering', and 'more evolved'. This way, people can feel free(in being part of something 'radical' and 'progressive') while also having the assurance that a higher authority does all the thinking and planning for them. They get to run free like dogs but in pursuit of sticks thrown by the master watching over them. (The fact that so many 'liberals' are drawn to bureaucracy, hierarchical institutions, and state power is all you need to know. The trick is to pepper the hive with the jive to lend the institution the conceit of inspiration. Hardly surprising that the New Authoritarianism is so closely aligned with hedonism in pop culture.)

It's no wonder that so-called 'liberals' have been easily led around by the nose by Jews who know human nature and mastered the ways of psychological manipulation. People want to feel free but are afraid to be free. It's like an amusement park. People love the 'wild' thrill of the roller coaster ride but only with the secure knowledge that everything is under control. Then, the formula for power is something that makes people feel free without the true burden that comes with real freedom. Turn modernity into something like a movie experience, i.e. all sorts of crazy exciting things happen on the screen but everything is secure and totally under control in the movie theater. Even the most independent-minded character in the Peanuts Comics, Linus Van Pelt, needed to compensate for his freedom of thought with a security blanket. More free you are, more anxious you are because, instead of relying on shared truisms and trust in authority, you feel a need to find your own path to truth, justice, enlightenment, empowerment.

So, what many people really want is authoritarianism packaged as 'liberation'. This way, they won't have to trouble themselves with real thought or course of action, which might be taxing on their minds and create all sorts of doubts and inner-havoc. They want something that flatters them for their 'progressive' and 'liberating' attitudes but really tells them what to believe, what to say, what to praise, what to hate. Most people are like the Cybill Shepherd character in TAXI DRIVER. 'Modern' and 'free' but safely within the confines of 'values', attitudes, and sensibilities established by others. Few people are like Jesus who founded a new church; most just want to belong to the big church, and most 'liberals' belong to the cathedral that tells them what to revere and revile.

And, this is perfectly fine with Jewish Power as Jews want to be the only ones doing the thinking, with most of it premised on "Is it Great for Jews?" As for goyim, let them feel 'free' and 'progressive' while, at the same time, enjoying the 'security' of being told what to believe, what to say, how to act, whom to hate. So, it's Jewish Power Uber Alles, and that means the so-called Liberals are now just a bunch of Uberalls.

We Must be on the Side of Truth because the Truth fears Freedom far less than the Lie does — Freedom & Honest Debate favor Truth over Lies, which is Why Jews as the Masters-of-Lies Now Attack Freedom — Jews fear Freedom will Expose their Power, so They protect the Lie with hysterics over 'Hate Speech'

How Silicon Valley, in a Show of Monopolistic Force, Destroyed Parler. In the last three months, tech giants have censored political speech and journalism to manipulate U.S. politics, while liberals, with virtual unanimity, have cheered. By Glenn Greenwald - https://greenwald.substack.com/p/how-silicon-valley-in-a-show-of-monopolistic

Freedom favors Truth over Lies, so those who are for freedom are on the side of Truth. Those who suppress freedom are on the side of lies.

The above article implies that truth is more on our side. After all, we aren't afraid of freedom of speech. While no side has a total lock on truth and no side is entirely false, it's generally the case that the side with more truth favors freedom(and free speech) while the side protecting the lie calls for control and restriction. The Lie fears freedom far more than the Truth does.

After all, truth can be demonstrated with facts and logic backed by honesty and integrity. Truth thrives in the light of freedom. In contrast, the lie must be shielded from scrutiny; it will shrivel and wither in the light of freedom.

If boxer A says he is the best and if boxer B says he is, the better boxer will be happy to meet the other claimant in the ring. It is the lying boxer who will duck the contest and keep claiming to be the best without ever proving it out in the open.
All the censorious scum today are ducking the fight. They might as well be called 'ducks'. Globo-ducks and conzo-cucks make up the US discourse. In the past, black boxers wanted to face white boxers in the ring because blacks knew the truth was on their side as better boxers. White boxers, fearful of this truth, often ducked black boxers. Truth is like Jack Johnson in the ring.

In an honest and fair debate, the truth can be demonstrated via free speech and open presentation. If someone says 2 + 2 = 4 and if another says 2 + 2 = 5, the former can show that he is right in the court of public opinion. He can use a pair of 2 wooden blocks to demonstrate that 2 pieces plus 2 pieces do indeed make 4 pieces.
It is the person claiming that 2 + 2= 5 who is fearful of freedom and free speech because, when forced to make his case, he cannot show that 2 wooden blocks plus 2 wooden blocks make 5 wooden blocks. So, to protect himself, he might come up with a concept like 'bogus speech' and insist that the person who says 2 + 2 = 4 is 'bogus' and needs to be shut down for spreading bogusness. That way, he can maintain 2 + 2 = 5 as the favored truth.

Now, some will say that free speech can unleash idiot holocaust deniers and people like Alex Jones, but such types can easily be exposed by the truth. Indeed, the main reason why the Holocaust Debate is restricted is not because the idiot Deniers are wrong(and they are wrong about most things) but because, in having an honest discussion about the Holocaust, it will also be proven that the Holocultists are also wrong on many accounts. While the Denier line that NO JEWS WERE KILLED is bogus, so is the myth that SIX MILLION DIED. A truly honest debate will lower the number of Jewish dead and blow up other shibboleths that have become the mainstay of the Holocaust Industry or Shoah Business. Truth will destroy the Deniers but also harm the Shoah Biz.
Also, keep in mind that people like Alex Jones thrive because the so-called MSM is so full of lies and suppress free discourse. MSM deceptions turn people cynical & suspicious and drive them to people like Alex Jones who claim to know the Secret Knowledge. If there were more freedom, free inquiry, free speech, and free debate, people like Alex Jones would lose their luster. While liars and lunatics will have their say under free speech regimen, they will be exposed and discredited sooner than later by those speaking the truth.

At any rate, Greenwald's piece has proven beyond a doubt that today's Liberals should be called LINOS or Liberals In Name Only. They are also LINOS because they LIE and say NO to freedom.

Unfortunately, Greenwald doesn't explain why 'Liberals' turned out this way. Yes, again it's Jewish Power. Jewish Liberals were never liberals first and Jews second. They were Jewish first and liberal second. For most Jews, liberalism was primarily a means to weaken and deracinate the goy majority so that Jews could gain more power and control. A typical Jewish Liberal will say to goyim, "Surrender your identity... and support OUR identity." On the occasion when Jews do support identity politics of goyim, it is as a weapon against the identity of the bigger foe, e.g. Jews supporting sham-versions of Ukrainian and Georgian nationalism against Russian nationalism or Jews supporting Kurdish nationalism against Syria.

In a nutshell, Jewish Power fears freedom because it will favor the truth that exposes the fact of Jewish Supremacist Domination. And so, Jewish Power promotes and protects the Big Lie and warns of freedom as a forum for 'hate speech'. What this really means is Jewish Power hates the freedom that allows the truth to be spoken to Jewish Power. Free inquiry will favor truth over lies. When both liars and truth-tellers have the freedom, the truth-tellers will win. Liars will win ONLY IF they are afforded freedom while truth-tellers are not. US is not a Liberal Democracy but a LINO Oligarchy where Jewish Liars have the freedom to say anything while cold facts and hard truth are suppressed as 'hate speech'. Watch the video below. This is what happens when the Lie meets the Truth in free and open forum.

Because Jews used liberalism as prop than principle, it's hardly surprising that they are for speech control now that they gained dominance. It's like the Bolsheviks spoke of freedom and justice on the path to power but were always about total control once they got the power. Still, if Bolsheviks were driven by ideology, Jewish 'liberats' have been all about identity.
But then, what about all the goy 'liberunts' who agree with Jews? That's due to the simple fact of our times: Jews lead, goyim follow. When Jewish Liberats were for free speech, goy Liberunts were for free speech. When Jewish Liberats are for shutting down free speech, goy Liberunts are for shutting down free speech. Jews lead, goyim follow. Master and dog.
It's the same among the conzos. Conzos will bitch and whine about how their free speech is violated by the 'Left' but then totally support the suppression of BDS by GOP and Democrats alike. They will rant about how the 'liberal' NYT fired Bari Weiss the free speech warrior(LOL) while totally ignoring the fact that, as student, she tried to have Arab professors critical of Israel fired.

Besides, even genuine liberals who believe in free speech have to go along with the Jews because Jews control the media. If you act like Chris Hedges or Glenn Greenwald, you will be demoted, fired, or worse. Also, Jews control the gods, true among both libby-bids and conzo-wonzos. The Tri-Supremacism of Just Jews, Holy Homos, and Noble Negroes has become such a fixture in the Western Imagination that people on both sides are more than willing to sacrifice freedom and principles to appease Jews and their gods.
But, there's something similar even in the Dissident Right, especially among the IQuters. IQuters like Jared Taylor, Derbyshire, Charles Murray, and others are so in awe of Jewish IQ that they would rather die than get real about the Jewish Problem and risk earning the opprobrium of the few Jewish friends they have. It's like many whites would rather die than be called 'racist'.

Greenwald didn't touch on the Jewish Question, maybe because he's Jewish himself or because the taboo is too powerful even for Subtrack; indeed, Matt Taibbi recently ridiculed the 'conspiracy theory' about Jews owning the media. ROTFL. I guess Joel Stein and Manny Friedman are conspiracy theorists. Friedman is an interesting case. Funny that Jews are more genuinely liberal in expression in a nationalist setting where they feel confident and secure. Maybe true nationalism is the best thing for liberalism. After all, a Jew in nationalist Jewish Israel is more likely to honestly and truthfully speak his mind than a Jew in diverse America where his priority isn't liberty, truth, and honesty but how-to-hoodwink-and-control-the-goyim-who-outnumber-us. That's why they are really just LINOS.

In a nutshell, Jewish Power fears freedom because it will favor the truth that exposes the fact of Jewish Supremacist Domination. And so, Jewish Power promotes and protects the Big Lie and warns of freedom as a forum for 'hate speech'. What this really means is Jewish Power hates the freedom that allows the truth to be spoken to Jewish Power.

Free inquiry will favor truth over lies. When both liars and truth-tellers have the freedom, the truth-tellers will win. Liars will win ONLY IF they are afforded freedom while truth-tellers are not. US is not a Liberal Democracy but a LINO Oligarchy where Jewish Liars have the freedom to say anything while cold facts and hard truth are suppressed as 'hate speech'.
Watch the video below. This is what happens when the Lie meets the Truth in free and open forum.